Teaching

Teaching philosophy

My teaching begins from a simple principle: if I expect students to perform an academic practice, I need to teach that practice rather than assume they already know it. I treat literature and writing as interconnected practices of inquiry. Reading closely means attending to how literary form shapes what a text can say; writing is where an interpretation is tested, complicated, and revised. I make the decisions behind close reading, argument, and research visible, so that students can practice them before they are assessed. My aim is to give students increasingly demanding opportunities to exercise their own judgment, and to build arguments that remain answerable to the texts they study.

Teaching areas

Selected courses

Robots — First-Year Writing Seminar

Cornell University

What does it mean to call something human? This seminar used the figure of the robot to ask how cultures imagine technology and automation, and where they draw the boundaries of the human. Stories about machines are also stories about labor—whose work is valued, and what follows when work is automated—and about personhood: who counts as a person, and on what grounds. Reading across literature, film, and music, students analyzed unfamiliar media on their own terms, asking how each form builds an argument about the human. Writing was the seminar’s method of inquiry: reflective portfolios made revision central to assessment, so that students could trace how their thinking about these questions changed over the semester.

English Composition II

Miami Dade College

I teach English Composition II through literature and cultural works, with particular attention to Caribbean and U.S.-Latinx writing. Students examine how literary form shapes experiences of place, migration, memory, and belonging while developing skills in close reading, formal analysis, argumentation, and scholarly research. The course progresses from sustained analysis of individual works to comparative arguments and research-based writing. Preparatory assignments, workshops, and feedback help students test interpretations, evaluate evidence, and revise their arguments as their questions become more complex.

Student perspectives

  • “Very well thought out course, very structured. The instructor was always prepared and had a great personality.”

  • “He did an excellent job leading discussions and helping us prepare for essays.”

  • “The professor met with me outside of class to provide help I needed, and gave really good feedback on essays.”

Anonymous student evaluations, Robots, Cornell University

Teaching in practice

At the center of my teaching is a sequence I call the archive lab, in which students carry the questions of close reading and literary analysis into research. They formulate a research question, locate and evaluate secondary sources, construct an annotated bibliography, and use a synthesis matrix to examine the relationships among their sources. We ask what each source can establish, where its limits lie, and whether the emerging evidence requires a different question. Research, in this sense, is a process that changes one’s questions and arguments, not an exercise in accumulating support for a predetermined thesis. Preparatory writing lets me encounter students’ reasoning before the final essay; structured feedback identifies the few changes that would most strengthen an argument; and workshops and revision make writing a continuation of inquiry.

Full teaching record in the CV